Pau vs Rodez - Free AI Predictions, Betting Tips & Odds

AI predicts Pau vs Rodez score, BTTS & O/U odds. See how Bingourou Kamara and Noah Cadiou makes a difference. Chat with AI. Free betting tips bot.

Match Information

Date 07/03/2025
Time 19:00:00
Tournament Ligue 2 - France
Pau Pau
Rodez Rodez

Predictions.GG AI Predictions

HOME 41.8 Confidence Level (%)
DRAW 32.4 Confidence Level (%)
AWAY 34.6 Confidence Level (%)
Predicted Score Pau 2-1 Rodez
Half-Time Score Pau 1-0 Rodez

Best Players - Pau

  • Bingourou Kamara AI Points: 187.27
  • P. Mboup AI Points: 147.89
  • Khalid Boutaïb AI Points: 146.55
  • Jean Ruiz AI Points: 136.7
  • Ange Ahoussou AI Points: 131.15

Best Players - Rodez

  • Noah Cadiou AI Points: 180.97
  • Timothé Nkada AI Points: 166.37
  • Mory Diaw AI Points: 161.44
  • Waniss Taïbi AI Points: 139.88
  • Loni Quenabio AI Points: 135.99

Emma Thornfield

🎙️ Football podcast host | 🔴 Arsenal till I die | 📻 Broadcasting from Islington | Collecting vintage programme covers since '98

Published at 15/05/2025

Match Overview

The upcoming Ligue 2 match between Pau and Rodez is set to be a significant fixture in the current season. Both teams are vying for crucial points that could influence their standings in the league. The match will take place at the Stade du Hameau, with kickoff scheduled for 19:00 on March 7, 2025.

Odds Analysis

The average odds for this match are as follows: Pau to win at 2.39, a draw at 3.09, and Rodez to win at 2.89. These odds suggest a closely contested match, with Pau having a slight edge as the home team. The probability of a Pau victory stands at approximately 41.8%, while Rodez has a 34.6% chance of winning. The likelihood of a draw is around 32.4%. Based on these odds, a narrow win for Pau seems the most expected outcome.

Team Analysis

Pau

  • Current Form & Statistics: Pau has played 24 matches this season, with an average of 1.13 goals per game and a possession rate of 48.21%.
  • Strengths: Pau's defense is relatively solid, with an average of 1.38 goals conceded per match. Their ability to intercept (37.29 per game) and clearances (3.92 per game) are notable.
  • Weaknesses: Offensively, Pau struggles with a lower goal-scoring rate and a reliance on key players like Khalid Boutaïb and P. Mboup, who have scored 6 goals each.

Rodez

  • Current Form & Statistics: Rodez has also played 24 matches, averaging 1.63 goals per game with a possession rate of 44.33%.
  • Strengths: Rodez's offensive capabilities are stronger, with a higher goal average and a better CompaScore Offensive Rating (539.31).
  • Weaknesses: Defensively, Rodez concedes 1.63 goals per game, which could be a vulnerability against Pau's home advantage.

Head-to-Head

Historically, matches between Pau and Rodez have been competitive, with both teams having their share of victories. The tactical approach from both sides will likely focus on exploiting each other's defensive weaknesses while maintaining a solid backline.

Key Players Spotlight

  • Pau: Khalid Boutaïb and P. Mboup are crucial for Pau's attacking efforts, each contributing 6 goals this season. Their performance will be vital in breaking down Rodez's defense.
  • Rodez: Timothé Nkada is a standout performer with 12 goals, making him a significant threat to Pau's defense. His matchup against Pau's defenders will be a key battle.

Statistical Deep Dive

  • Offensive Metrics: Rodez leads with an average of 1.63 goals per game compared to Pau's 1.13.
  • Defensive Metrics: Pau's defense is slightly more robust, conceding fewer goals on average.
  • Possession & Passing: Pau has a higher possession rate and more successful passes, which could be crucial in controlling the game's tempo.

Prediction and Conclusion

Based on the data, Pau's home advantage and slightly better defensive record give them a slight edge. However, Rodez's offensive prowess cannot be underestimated. The match-winning factors will likely include Pau's ability to contain Timothé Nkada and capitalize on their possession advantage. A narrow victory for Pau is predicted, with a final score of 2-1.