Clermont vs Grenoble - Ilmaiset AI Ennusteet, Vedonlyöntivinkit ja Kertoimet

AI ennustaa Clermont vs Grenoble ottelun tuloksen, BTTS-kertoimet ja yli/alle. Katso miten Jérémy Jacquet ja Mamadou Diop vaikuttavat tulokseen. Keskustele AI:n kanssa. Ilmainen vedonlyöntivinkki-botti.

Ottelun tiedot

Päivämäärä 14.3.2025
Aika 19.00.00
Clermont Clermont
Grenoble Grenoble

Predictions.GG AI Ennusteet

KOTI 46.9 Luottamustaso (%)
TASAPELI 31.7 Luottamustaso (%)
VIERAS 29.9 Luottamustaso (%)
Ennustettu tulos 1-1
Puoliaikatulos 0-0

Parhaat pelaajat - Clermont

  • Jérémy Jacquet AI Points: 159.82
  • Massamba N'Diaye AI Points: 150.41
  • Johan Gastien AI Points: 137.32
  • Damien Da Silva AI Points: 134.23
  • Yoann Salmier AI Points: 125.2

Parhaat pelaajat - Grenoble

  • Mamadou Diop AI Points: 216.45
  • Pape Meïssa Ba AI Points: 188.63
  • Théo Valls AI Points: 146.84
  • Gaëtan Paquiez AI Points: 130.14
  • Matthéo Xantippe AI Points: 123.25

Aino Virtanen

🎿 Maastohiihtäjä | ⚪🔵 HJK Helsinki uskollinen | 📝 Taktiikka-analyysi blogi | Suomalaisia pelaajia seuraten

Julkaistu 15.5.2025

Match Overview

Clermont and Grenoble face off in a pivotal Ligue 2 match that could shape their respective campaigns. With Clermont sitting in the middle of the table, they are eager to climb higher, while Grenoble aims to maintain their competitive edge. The match will take place at Clermont's home stadium, providing them with a slight advantage.

Odds Analysis

The average odds for this match are as follows: Clermont to win at 2.13, a draw at 3.15, and Grenoble to win at 3.35. These odds suggest a tight contest, with Clermont having a slight edge as the home team. The probability of a Clermont victory stands at approximately 46.9%, a draw at 31.7%, and a Grenoble win at 29.9%. Based on these odds, Clermont is favored to secure a win, but a draw remains a strong possibility.

Team Analysis

Clermont

  • Current Form: Clermont has played 24 matches this season, with a mixed record.
  • Strengths: Possession play (51.75%), solid defensive interceptions (39.38 per match).
  • Weaknesses: Low goal-scoring rate (0.88 goals per match), high expected goals against (1.55).
  • Head-to-Head: Historically, Clermont has had a balanced record against Grenoble, making this match unpredictable.
  • Tactical Approach: Expect Clermont to focus on maintaining possession and exploiting set-piece opportunities.

Grenoble

  • Current Form: Grenoble has played 25 matches, showing a slightly better form than Clermont.
  • Strengths: Higher goal-scoring rate (1.2 goals per match), effective duels (96.72 successful duels per match).
  • Weaknesses: Lower possession rate (47.24%), vulnerability in dangerous own half losses (6.04 per match).
  • Head-to-Head: Grenoble has been competitive against Clermont, often matching their intensity.
  • Tactical Approach: Grenoble will likely focus on counter-attacks and utilizing their offensive strengths.

Key Players Spotlight

Clermont

  • Jérémy Jacquet: Key defender with 159.82 points, crucial for defensive stability.
  • Maïdine Douane & Mons Bassouamina: Both have scored 3 goals, vital for Clermont's attacking efforts.

Grenoble

  • Pape Meïssa Ba: Top scorer with 10 goals, a significant threat to Clermont's defense.
  • Mamadou Diop: Leading player with 228.47 points, instrumental in both attack and defense.

Statistical Deep Dive

  • Offensive Metrics: Grenoble leads with 1.2 goals per match compared to Clermont's 0.88.
  • Defensive Metrics: Clermont concedes 1.29 goals per match, slightly higher than Grenoble's 1.16.
  • Possession and Passing: Clermont has a higher possession rate, but Grenoble excels in key passes (3.36 per match).

Prediction and Conclusion

Based on the analysis, Clermont holds a slight advantage due to their home ground and possession play. However, Grenoble's offensive capabilities, led by Pape Meïssa Ba, could turn the tide. The match-winning factors will likely be Clermont's ability to control the game and Grenoble's counter-attacking prowess. Expect a closely contested match with a potential final score of 1-1, reflecting the balanced nature of both teams.